Recently in domain hijack Category

Something is rotten in the state of Denmark : Danish Dispute Policies Allow Reverse Hijacks?

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
You'll have to excuse me for the Shakespeare quote, but something is rotten in the state of Denmark.

While talking to some of the people involved with the Danish domain industry it becomes evident that there is something something seriously wrong with how .dk handles disputes.

A recent case revolved around the domain orango.dk

The domain had been registered for nearly 10 years (since 2000)

The registrant was using the domain in good faith since they registered the domain name, but now found themselves subject to a dispute.

The dispute involves a 3rd party that have requested a trademark for "orango", but only did so this year.

Somehow, and this is the bit that makes absolutely no sense to me, the arbitration court found in favour of the complainant!

If that isn't a reverse hijack then I'd love to know what it is!

Maybe Danish registrants would be better off using other TLDs?

You can download the original text of the decision here (it's in Danish)

Thanks to the guys in Larsen Data for providing various translations of it. (Peter has posted about it also - again in Danish)
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Solidhost Saga Continues

|
solidhost-logo.jpgI mentioned the issue facing Solidhost a while back. Although the legal proceedings are still ongoing the Dutch company have managed to regain control of the domain name in the interim.

In a post on the company's forum Andre van Vliet was very candid about what was going on:

As of today we have recovered our domain solidhost.com - it now belongs to us again and is completely under our own control.

The lawsuit against the registrars and hijacker is not over yet, however through a premilary injunction the court has decided that we have provided more than enough evidence that the domainname is our property. The hijacker has a few more days to respond to the lawsuit in order to object this decision, but we do not expect him to respond at all (as he would then also have to identify himself).

Until the case is over, I'm afraid I cannot share any information about the claims for recovery of our damages (resulting from the hijack). Needless to say - as soon as we are able to - more information about this will be posted later.

Solid Host To Sue Enom and Namecheap

|
solidhost-logo.jpg
Normally when I see headlines about companies suing registrars I have to read "more" to find out what has happened.

In the case of SolidHost that isn't the case, as I've been following this story quite closely over the last couple of weeks.



Around 7pm on August 4th Solidhost sent their clients an email saying that their site was unavailable as the domain had been hijacked.

They also informed clients that they would be providing information on an alternative site.

There's a post over on their forum, as well as a very very long thread over on WHT


About this Archive

This page is a archive of recent entries in the domain hijack category.

domain aftermarket is the previous category.

Domain Squatters is the next category.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.31-en