Domains: May 2008 Archives

Image via Wikipedia
In most cases decisions are either upheld or denied and when they are upheld the normal followup would be for the domain in question to be transferred to the IP holder.
However WIPO's latest set of UDRP decisions shows a different line of thought entirely.
In several cases involving pharmaceutical products the panel has decided in favour of cancelling the domains.
But what is to stop someone from simply re-registering them again? Couldn't I or anyone else just grab the domains as soon as they became available for registration.
Maybe I'm missing some finer detail that only an "inner circle" is privy to.





Recent Comments
John McCormac on DNS.be Release Figures Of Domain Usage: It looks l
Michele Neylon on OVH Abuse AFNIC Member Database: Maigre Ou
Maigre on OVH Abuse AFNIC Member Database: OVH is not
Niall on IEDR Annual Report 2008 - More Fluff: Comreg are
Gary Smith on Nominet Board Elections Results 2009: The commen
ArianaZige on Dotmobi Release Wordpress Mobile Pack: I love it!
Michele Neylon on New TLDs Need Sanity: Francesco
Francesco on New TLDs Need Sanity: TBH .taxi
Patrick on ICANN IRT Report Open For Comment With Short Timeframe: There's a